Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="cheryl" data-source="post: 1291" data-attributes="member: 1"><a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/7/19/20699366/interest-rates-unemployment-globalization-minimum-wage-deficit" target="_blank">What economists have gotten wrong for decades - Vox</a>Four economic ideas disproven by reality. In a House hearing on monetary policy last week, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made a telling confession in response to a <a href="http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/aoc-is-making-monetary-policy-cool-and-political-again.html" target="_blank">question</a> from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). The topic was the so-called natural rate of unemployment: the idea, believed by many economists and policymakers, that there is a rate at which unemployment could get so low that it could trigger ever-rising inflation.It’s an idea that has governed decades of monetary policymaking, often prompting the Fed to keep interest rates higher than it should — slowing down the economy in the process — out of fear of accelerating inflation.Ocasio-Cortez didn’t waste time poking holes at it. She pointed out that the unemployment rate, now 3.7 percent, has fallen well below the Fed’s estimates of the natural rate, which it forecast at 5.4 percent in 2014 and 4.2 percent today. And yet, she noted, “inflation is no higher today than it was five years ago. Given these facts, do you think it’s possible that the Fed’s estimates of the lowest sustainable unemployment rate may have been too high?”</blockquote>

Verification