Home
Forums
New posts
Contact Us
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Search All
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Contact Us
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Really good
Life
Study: Personal anecdotes are more effective at bridging divides than facts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cheryl" data-source="post: 2725" data-attributes="member: 1"><p><a href="https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/conflict-resolution-techniques" target="_blank"><strong>Study: Personal anecdotes are more effective at bridging divides than facts - Big Think</strong></a></p><p></p><p><strong>Most people believe you can win an argument with facts - but when "facts" are so often subject to doubt, are personal experiences trusted more?</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A new study has found that people are more likely to get respect from others in moral and political conversations when sharing personal experiences instead of facts.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The research group conducted 15 separate experiments to test this theory in order to learn more about tolerance in specifically political arguments.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The effectiveness of facts in these conversations (even when proven true) is unclear because facts themselves are now subject to doubt, especially surrounding controversial and polarizing topics such as gun control and political beliefs.</li> </ul><p>Researchers at the University of Koblenz-Landau, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, and the Wharton School of Business have found that people are more likely to get respect from others in moral and political conversations when sharing personal experiences instead of facts. The research group conducted 15 separate experiments to test this theory and to learn more about tolerance in specifically political arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cheryl, post: 2725, member: 1"] [URL='https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/conflict-resolution-techniques'][B]Study: Personal anecdotes are more effective at bridging divides than facts - Big Think[/B][/URL] [B]Most people believe you can win an argument with facts - but when "facts" are so often subject to doubt, are personal experiences trusted more?[/B] [LIST] [*]A new study has found that people are more likely to get respect from others in moral and political conversations when sharing personal experiences instead of facts. [*]The research group conducted 15 separate experiments to test this theory in order to learn more about tolerance in specifically political arguments. [*]The effectiveness of facts in these conversations (even when proven true) is unclear because facts themselves are now subject to doubt, especially surrounding controversial and polarizing topics such as gun control and political beliefs. [/LIST] Researchers at the University of Koblenz-Landau, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, and the Wharton School of Business have found that people are more likely to get respect from others in moral and political conversations when sharing personal experiences instead of facts. The research group conducted 15 separate experiments to test this theory and to learn more about tolerance in specifically political arguments. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Really good
Life
Study: Personal anecdotes are more effective at bridging divides than facts
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top